What is “cannibalism”? It could refer to two actions: eating your own flesh or eating the flesh of another of one’s own kind.
Stars cannibalize themselves. Then cannibalize their kin,
their solar systems.
Cannibalism among animals is more widespread than often
thought: chimpanzees, polar bears, and even, possibly, dolphins.
The universe itself, according to the current understandings
of physics, cannibalizes its own energy, burning itself away into "darkness."
Cannibalism plays against similarity and difference. For
instance, the individual eats another individual of the same kind. Or the mouth
eats another body part. It would be tough for the mouth to eat itself, although
some desperate or deranged people have chomped on their very lips.
Pierre Joris’ “Antlers” gathers the universe about a word, "antlers," a
word of cannibalism, of defense, of killing, of awe, of a glorious story ultimately to be
ignored because of the gnawing of time, the gnawing of other, more important
concerns.
To live is cave into yourself, to grow hungry for your own
vitality, to grow stooped as a result of your own voraciousness, to chomp
against yourself: a law of nature as inexorable as gravity.
(If you don’t like it, go to another universe.)
The only body part you can't cannibilize is your mouth. But
another will do it for you. Will eat away your most basic childhood enunciations, calling
them anything but okay, twisting your talk into channels where it will die an acceptable death—slowly, rather than quickly.
I recall a dinner where we adults talked of the auto industry cannibalizing the streetcars. And a young child wailing when he found the restaurant had run out of his ice cream. He wailed, full-throated, from the ocean's spongy bottom. I loved him for it. And his parents, necessarily, had to hush him. And I loved them for that, but not as much as I loved the child—in that moment.
Maybe he would become a poet of sorts, singing of change.
I recall a dinner where we adults talked of the auto industry cannibalizing the streetcars. And a young child wailing when he found the restaurant had run out of his ice cream. He wailed, full-throated, from the ocean's spongy bottom. I loved him for it. And his parents, necessarily, had to hush him. And I loved them for that, but not as much as I loved the child—in that moment.
Maybe he would become a poet of sorts, singing of change.
“What does not change is the will to change,” said the poet
Charles Olson, but change can’t be helped—will or no will. Change just happens. Here, Joris veers
from the pronunications of Olson: Joris enacts change—as root deep to
his poetics as ink and papyrus. As inevitable as the cannibalism of the
universe.
To me, the antlers in Joris’ poem become an emblem of
cannibalism, of the glory of the hunt and sustenance, of the losing of that
glory in the grind of living and caring, of one priority chewing and discarding
another, of old glories faintly pulsing, a pulsar, only an echo of what it once
was.
Your very organs eat themselves—fire dropping to embers
dropping to mere ash. Your hairline, your skin, your heart muscle—your child
gnaws at as you worry.
We will grow old, and, in turn, gnaw at our children. Most accept out of duty, some gladly and gratefully remembering what we did for them, others grudgingly.
Love sustains us. And eats us.
_____________________
Pierre Joris, Brecchia: Selected Poems 1972-1986 (éditons phi, Station Hill, 1987)
Pierre Joris, Poasis: Selected Poems 1986-1999 (Wesleyan UP, 2001)
Peter Cockelbergh, Pierre Joris—Cartographies of the In-Between (Litteraria Pragensia, 2011)
No comments:
Post a Comment